Skip to content

Court Case Editorial

The May 16th issue of Jinja Shinpō carried an editorial about the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear Jinja Honchō’s appeal in the court case. Editorials in Jinja Shinpō are unsigned, but written by members of a group chosen because they are influential opinion formers within the Shinto world. Thus, the editorials are expected to be influential in shaping the future direction of Shinto, and are written on that assumption.

The title of this editorial could be loosely translated as “Pull Ourselves Together and Remember That We Are Supposed To Set An Example”. (It’s quite a bit shorter in Japanese.) The editorial starts with a very quick summary of the case, although I cannot imagine that anyone reading it needs one. The next section is interesting. It seems to be arguing that, even if people do not agree that the current legal framework for jinja correctly captures their fundamental character, they still need to follow the laws that apply. (This is almost certainly connected to the idea that jinja should be state institutions, as they were in the pre-war period, but the whole section — to be honest, the whole editorial — is a little oblique.)

The second half of the editorial is the most interesting. First, the author asks whether there were really no actions that went against the spirit of the people who wrote Jinja Honchō’s constitution, and no actions that looked suspicious. This is obviously a rhetorical question. However, the author goes on to draw attention to the real estate transaction that started the whole thing, and the personnel decisions that were the immediate cause of the court case. In other words, the author is suggesting that Jinja Honchō needs to take a hard look at itself.

The final section of the editorial says, effectively, that Jinja Honchō needs to do a lot more to solve the problems exposed by this dispute. It emphasises that Jinja Honchō is supposed to be an organisation of equals, that this case should be taken as an opportunity to totally rethink the structure and approach of Jinja Honchō so that it can be an “organisation with which anyone can cooperate, and with which no-one is reluctant to cooperate”.

This was published a week or so before the meeting of the Oversight Council, and can be expected to have been influential in setting the (informal) agenda. It will be very interesting to see the report of what happened at the meeting.

I have a Patreon, where people join as paid members to receive an in-depth essay on some aspect of Shinto every month, or as free members to receive notifications of updates to this blog. If that sounds interesting to you, please take a look.

1 thought on “Court Case Editorial”

  1. Hello David,

    I have just become aware of your work and it seems to be highly valuable.
    My personal experiences have led me down my own spiritual shinto path, and I have been working on cutting edge research for many years. My latest upcoming work: Interactive standard model, could be highly useful to spiritual and shinto studies, but also science, games design, and philosophy.

    I would like to ask if you would join my Facebook group: Shinto experience, new sect?

    It’s a bit of a long shot, but I hope you become interested in my work and thoughts, and in turn, we can interact.

    Yours sincerely,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.